Learning SCS-C02 Materials & SCS-C02 Training Tools

Blog Article

Tags: Learning SCS-C02 Materials, SCS-C02 Training Tools, Reliable SCS-C02 Exam Tutorial, SCS-C02 Download, SCS-C02 Reliable Dumps Free

ActualTestsIT, the best certification company helps you climb the ladder to success. Getting Amazon SCS-C02 certification is setting the pathway to the height of your career. This career-oriented credential opens up vistas of opportunities for you to many medium and large-sized organizations. Such a tremendous opportunity is just a step ahead. Try SCS-C02 Dumps to ensure your success in exam with money back guarantee.

Amazon SCS-C02 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Management and Security Governance: This topic teaches AWS Security specialists to develop centralized strategies for AWS account management and secure resource deployment. It includes evaluating compliance and identifying security gaps through architectural reviews and cost analysis, essential for implementing governance aligned with certification standards.
Topic 2	Threat Detection and Incident Response: In this topic, AWS Security specialists gain expertise in crafting incident response plans and detecting security threats and anomalies using AWS services. It delves into effective strategies for responding to compromised resources and workloads, ensuring readiness to manage security incidents. Mastering these concepts is critical for handling scenarios assessed in the SCS-C02 Exam.
Topic 3	Infrastructure Security: Aspiring AWS Security specialists are trained to implement and troubleshoot security controls for edge services, networks, and compute workloads under this topic. Emphasis is placed on ensuring resilience and mitigating risks across AWS infrastructure. This section aligns closely with the exam's focus on safeguarding critical AWS services and environments.

>> Learning SCS-C02 Materials <<

Pass-guaranteed SCS-C02 Exam Practice Display the High-quality Training Materials - ActualTestsIT

PassitCertify works hard to provide the most recent version of Amazon SCS-C02 Exams through the efforts of a team of knowledgeable and certified AWS Certified Security - Specialty SCS-C02 Exams experts. Actual Dumps Our professionals update AWS Certified Security - Specialty SCS-C02 on a regular basis. You must answer all AWS Certified Security - Specialty SCS-C02 questions in order to pass the AWS Certified Security - Specialty SCS-C02 exam.

Amazon AWS Certified Security - Specialty Sample Questions (Q115-Q120):

NEW QUESTION # 115
A security engineer is designing an IAM policy to protect AWS API operations. The policy must enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for IAM users to access certain services in the AWS production account.
Each session must remain valid for only 2 hours. The current version of the IAM policy is as follows:

Which combination of conditions must the security engineer add to the IAM policy to meet these requirements? (Select TWO.)

A. "B001 " : " aws : MultiFactorAuthPresent": "false" }
B. "Bool " : " aws : Multi FactorAuthPresent": "true" }
C. "NumericLessThan" : { "MaxSessionDuration " : "7200"}
D. "NumericGreaterThan" : { " aws : MultiFactorAuthAge " : "7200"
E. "NumericLessThan" : { " aws : Multi FactorAuthAge" : "7200"}

Answer: B,E

Explanation:
The correct combination of conditions to add to the IAM policy is A and C. These conditions will ensure that IAM users must use MFA to access certain services in the AWS production account, and that each session will expire after 2 hours.
* Option A: "Bool" : { "aws:MultiFactorAuthPresent" : "true" } is a valid condition that checks if the principal (the IAM user) has authenticated with MFA before making the request. This condition will enforce MFA for the IAM users to accessthe specified services.This condition key is supported by all AWS services that support IAM policies1.
* Option B: "Bool" : { "aws:MultiFactorAuthPresent" : "false" } is the opposite of option A. This condition will allow access only if the principal has not authenticated with MFA, which is not the desired requirement.This condition key is supported by all AWS services that support IAM policies1.
* Option C: "NumericLessThan" : { "aws:MultiFactorAuthAge" : "7200" } is a valid condition that checks if the time since the principal authenticated with MFA is less than 7200 seconds (2 hours). This condition will enforce the session duration limit for the IAM users.This condition key is supported by all AWS services that support IAM policies1.
* Option D: "NumericGreaterThan" : { "aws:MultiFactorAuthAge" : "7200" } is the opposite of option C: This condition will allow access only if the time since the principal authenticated with MFA is more than 7200 seconds (2 hours), which is not the desired requirement.This condition key is supported by all AWS services that support IAM policies1.
* Option E: "NumericLessThan" : { "MaxSessionDuration" : "7200" } is not a valid condition key.
MaxSessionDuration is a property of an IAM role, not a condition key. It specifies the maximum session duration (in seconds) for the role, which can be between 3600 and 43200 seconds (1 to 12 hours).This property can be set when creating or modifying arole, but it cannot be used as a condition in a policy2.

NEW QUESTION # 116
A security engineer has noticed an unusually high amount of traffic coming from a single IP address. This was discovered by analyzing the Application Load Balancer's access logs.
How can the security engineer limit the number of requests from a specific IP address without blocking the IP address?

A. Use AWS Shield to limit the originating traffic hit rate.
B. Implement a rate-based rule with AWS WAF.
C. Implement the GeoLocation feature in Amazon Route 53.
D. Add a rule to the Application Load Balancer to route the traffic originating from the IP address in question and show a static webpage.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
To mitigate traffic volume from a specific IP address without entirely blocking it, AWS WAF's rate-based rules are the appropriate solution. AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) provides rate-based rules that allow a user to count and limit the rate of requests from individual IP addresses.
A rate-based rule tracks the number of requests that each originating IP makes in a rolling five-minute period.
If the number of requests exceeds a specified threshold, WAF applies an action such as block or count.
This makes AWS WAF an ideal tool to throttle traffic rather than block it, which directly meets the use case described.
Reference from AWS Certified Security - Specialty Official Guide:
This capability is part of AWS WAF's standard feature set, explicitly covered under the topics of Logging and Monitoring and Mitigating DDoS and Abnormal Behavior. Rate-based rules are discussed as a method for limiting the number of incoming requests based on request patterns without denying access outright.

NEW QUESTION # 117
A security engineer is configuring AWS Config for an AWS account that uses a new IAM entity.
When the security engineer tries to configure AWS Config rules and automatic remediation options, errors occur. In the AWS CloudTrail logs, the security engineer sees the following error message: "Insufficient delivery policy to s3 bucket: DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKET, unable to write to bucket, provided s3 key prefix is 'null'." Which combination of steps should the security engineer take to remediate this issue? (Choose two.)

A. Verify that the IAM entity has the permissions necessary to perform the s3:GetBucketAcl and s3:PutObject* operations to write to the target bucket.
B. Check the Amazon S3 bucket policy. Verify that the policy allows the config amazonaws,com service to write to the target bucket.
C. Check the policy that is associated with the IAM entity. Verify that the policy allows the config.amazonaws.com service to write to the target bucket.
D. Verify that the Amazon S3 bucket policy has the permissions necessary to perform the s3:GetBucketAcl and s3:PutObject* operations to write to the target bucket.
E. Verify that the AWS Config service role has permissions to invoke the BatchGetResourceConfig action instead of the GetResourceConfigHistory action and s3:PutObject* operation.

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
https://repost.aws/knowledge-center/config-console-error

NEW QUESTION # 118
A security engineer is troubleshooting an AWS Lambda function that is named MyLambdaFunction. The function is encountering an error when the function attempts to read the objects in an Amazon S3 bucket that is named DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKET. The S3 bucket has the following bucket policy:

Which change should the security engineer make to the policy to ensure that the Lambda function can read the bucket objects?

A. Change the Resource element to "arn:aws:s3:::DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKET/*".
B. Remove the Condition element. Change the Principal element to the following:{"AWS": "arn "aws" :::
lambda ::: function:MyLambdaFunction"}
C. Change the Resource element to "arn:aws:lambda:::function:MyLambdaFunction". Change the Principal element to the following:{"Service": "s3.amazonaws.com"}
D. Change the Action element to the following:" s3:GetObject*"" s3:GetBucket*"

Answer: A

Explanation:
The correct answer is C. Change the Resource element to "arn:aws:s3:::DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKET/*".
The reason is that the Resource element in the bucket policy specifies which objects in the bucket are affected by the policy. In this case, the policy only applies to the bucket itself, not the objects inside it. Therefore, the Lambda function cannot access the objects with the s3:GetObject permission. To fix this, the Resource element should include a wildcard (*) to match all objects in the bucket. This way, the policy grants the Lambda function permission to read any object in the bucket.
The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:
* A. Removing the Condition element would not help, because it only restricts access based on the source IP address of the request. The Principal element should not be changed to the Lambda function ARN, because it specifies who is allowed or denied access by the policy. The policy should allow access to any principal ("*") and rely on IAM roles or policies to control access to the Lambda function.
* B. Changing the Action element to include s3:GetBucket* would not help, because it would grant additional permissions that are not needed by the Lambda function, such as s3:GetBucketAcl or s3:
GetBucketPolicy. The s3:GetObject* permission is sufficient for reading objects in the bucket.
* D. Changing the Resource element to the Lambda function ARN would not make sense, because it would mean that the policy applies to the Lambda function itself, not the bucket or its objects. The Principal element should not be changed to s3.amazonaws.com, because it would grant access to any AWS service that uses S3, not just Lambda.

NEW QUESTION # 119
A company is implementing new compliance requirements to meet customer needs. According to the new requirements the company must not use any Amazon RDS DB instances or DB clusters that lack encryption of the underlying storage. The company needs a solution that will generate an email alert when an unencrypted DB instance or DB cluster is created. The solution also must terminate the unencrypted DB instance or DB cluster.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST operationally efficient manner?

A. Create an AWS Config managed rule to detect unencrypted RDS storage. Configure a manual remediation action to invoke an AWS Lambda function. Configure the Lambda function to publish messages to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic and to delete the unencrypted resource.
B. Create an AWS Config managed rule to detect unencrypted ROS storage. Configure an automatic remediation action to publish messages to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic that includes an AWS Lambda function and an email delivery target as subscribers. Configure the Lambda function to delete the unencrypted resource.
C. Create an Amazon EventBridge rule that evaluates RDS event patterns and is initiated by the creation of DB instances or DB clusters. Configure the rule to invoke an AWS Lambda function. Configure the Lambda function to publish messages to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic and to delete the unencrypted resource.
D. Create an Amazon EventBridge rule that evaluates RDS event patterns and is initiated by the creation of DB instances or DB clusters Configure the rule to publish messages to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic that includes an AWS Lambda function and an email delivery target as subscribers. Configure the Lambda function to delete the unencrypted resource.

Answer: B

Explanation:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/config/latest/developerguide/rds-storage-encrypted.html

NEW QUESTION # 120
......

Experts before starting the compilation of " the SCS-C02 latest questions ", has put all the contents of the knowledge point build a clear framework in mind, though it needs a long wait, but product experts and not give up, but always adhere to the effort, in the end, they finished all the compilation. So, you're lucky enough to meet our SCS-C02 Test Guide l, and it's all the work of the experts. If you want to pass the qualifying SCS-C02 exam with high quality, choose our SCS-C02 exam questions. We are absolutely responsible for you. Don't hesitate!

SCS-C02 Training Tools: https://www.actualtestsit.com/Amazon/SCS-C02-exam-prep-dumps.html

Report this page

LEARNING SCS-C02 MATERIALS & SCS-C02 TRAINING TOOLS

Learning SCS-C02 Materials & SCS-C02 Training Tools